The South African courts are evaluating ChatGPT’s potential role in the legal system and are investigating its practical utility. As part of this experiment, ChatGPT is provided with a legal scenario and asked to draft a judgment based on relevant facts and legal principles. As acting judges of the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Local Division, Johannesburg, you are assigned an exercise to assess the accuracy and reliability of ChatGPT. This assignment must be completed in pairs (groups of two). You may not change a teammate once you have signed up as a team on Ulwazi. All teams must sign up by 17 August 2023. A list of teams will be extracted for marking purposes on 18 August 2023, and thus cannot be changed.
Your tasks include:
1. Review the case facts and analyse ChatGPT’s judgment provided below.
2. Rewrite the judgment in adherence to the correct format and structure, referencing applicable primary and secondary sources that pertain to the case.
3. Your rewritten judgment should not directly address ChatGPT’s version but instead present the “correct” judgment in terms of both format and substantive content.
4. The body of your judgment must not exceed 1500 words. The word count excludes the footnotes and bibliography.
5. Use footnotes following the South African Law Journal or South African Journal on Human Rights referencing styles. The font to be used is Arial 12pt.
6. Do not consult ChatGPT or any similar generative AI system to craft your judgment.
Nandi Mathebula, a pregnant woman in her seventh month, seeks medical care at Mofolo South Clinic in Soweto. She has been experiencing complications with her pregnancy and is concerned about her baby’s health. Dr Thabo Mokoena, a well-respected obstetrician at the clinic, is assigned to her case.
During one of Nandi’s routine check-ups, Dr Mokoena administers medication that he believes will help alleviate her symptoms. However, due to a mix-up in patient records, Nandi is inadvertently given a medication that is contraindicated during pregnancy. The mistake goes unnoticed, and Nandi is sent home.
Within a few days, Nandi begins to experience severe abdominal pain and complications. She rushes back to the clinic, where it is discovered that the incorrect medication has caused significant harm to her unborn child, whom she plans to name Vuyani. Medical examinations reveal that Vuyani has suffered internal organ damage and potential developmental issues because of the medication. It has been proven that Dr Mokoena acted negligently in administering this medication to Nandi.
Nandi, devastated and concerned for her child’s well-being, seeks legal advice. Her legal team argues that, under the nasciturus fiction, Vuyani has the right to claim damages for injuries caused by Dr Mokoena’s medical negligence. The claim is set at R1 million.
Dr Mokoena’s defence legal team argues that while the medication error was unfortunate, it is impossible to afford legal claims to an unborn child, despite Vuyani’s injuries. They also contend that applying the nasciturus fiction in this case could set a precedent that could lead to complex legal determinations.
3. ChatGPT’s judgment
In the High Court of South Africa Gauteng Division, Johannesburg Case No: 701/2023
In the matter between:
Nandi Mathebula, Plaintiff
Thabo Mokoena, Defendant
This case involves a critical legal issue concerning the applicability of the nasciturus fiction and its implications on the claim for damages brought forth by the plaintiff, Nandi Mathebula. The court must determine whether Nandi Mathebula has the legal standing to claim damages on behalf of her unborn child, Vuyani Mathebula, as a result of the alleged negligence of the defendant, Dr Thabo Mokoena.
Nandi Mathebula, a pregnant woman in her seventh month, sought medical attention for pregnancy complications at a reputable clinic in Soweto. Dr Thabo Mokoena, a well-regarded obstetrician at the Mofolo South Clinic, administered medication to Nandi, which was subsequently revealed to be contraindicated during pregnancy. The administration of the inappropriate medication purportedly led to significant harm suffered by Nandi’s unborn child, Thabo Mathebula.
The pivotal issue for the court’s consideration is whether Nandi Mathebula has the legal standing to claim damages on behalf of her unborn child, Thabo Mathebula, in the context of the alleged negligence committed by Dr Vuyani Mokoena. This hinges on whether the nasciturus fiction, a legal concept, can be invoked in this case to recognise the unborn child as having legal rights.
The court carefully examined the principles surrounding the nasciturus fiction. This doctrine is founded on the notion that an unborn child is deemed to be a separate legal entity with rights that can be invoked, particularly in instances where the child is injured or harmed before birth. The principle’s application is contingent upon factors such as the viability of the child, the extent of the injuries, and the overall legal and ethical considerations.
In the current matter, the court finds that Nandi Mathebula has effectively demonstrated that her unborn child, has sustained substantial harm due to the alleged negligence of Dr Thabo Mokoena. This harm is asserted to be sufficient to establish the child’s legal interests and the potential for damages arising from the harm inflicted during the gestational period.
After due consideration of the presented evidence and legal arguments, the court rules that the nasciturus fiction applies to this case. This conclusion is drawn from the compelling evidence indicating that Vuyani Mathebula has suffered significant harm because of the medication error attributed to Dr Thabo Mokoena. The court recognises the legal interests of an unborn child and upholds the plaintiff’s standing to claim damages on his behalf. The defendant is ordered to pay an award of damages worth R1 million to the plaintiff and the legal costs of two counsel.
It is hereby ordered that the plaintiff, Nandi Mathebula, has the legal standing to bring forth a claim for damages on behalf of her unborn child, Thabo Mathebula. The proceedings shall continue on this basis, and the court shall proceed to assess the extent of damages based on the evidence presented during the trial.
DATED this 1st day of August 2023.
Judge of the High Court
Gauteng Division, Johannesburg South
Answer to Above Question on Law of Persons
Answer: An analysis of the given case in the high court of South Africa indicates that it is a matter between Nandi Mathebula and Thabo Mokoena and the case is all about seeking for damages on behalf of Nandi Mathebula’s unborn child, Vuyani Mathebula. The background of the case indicates that Nandi Mathebula was a 7 month pregnant woman and she was undergoing medical treatment because of complications arising from pregnancy at Mofolo South Clinic.
Content Removal Request
If you believe that the content above belongs to you, and you don’t want it to be published anymore, then request for its removal by filling the details below. It will only be removed if you can provide sufficient evidence of its ownership.