A consumer complaint against Pick n Pay for a misleading advert for boxes of long-life milk for R69,99 has been upheld by the Advertising Regulatory Board (ARB).
Complainant Willem Heckroodt submitted that when he went to buy the advertised special, he was told the offer was limited to two boxes per customer. He felt this was a case of misleading advertising because nowhere in the advert nor in any of the in-store advertising or displays was it stated the offer was limited.
In its response to the complaint, Pick n Pay said that its pamphlets and catalogues claim offers were subject to stock availability. Its store managers were permitted to exercise their discretion to set a limit per customer when the stock of a product was running low.
Pick n Pay said this might happen in cases where an advertised product sold faster than anticipated. Quantity limits could be set to ensure more customers benefitted from the promotion.
The ARB said its clause in the Code of Advertising Practice relating to misleading advertising claims states: “Advertisements should not contain any statement or visual presentation which, directly or by implication, omission, ambiguity, inaccuracy, exaggerated claim or otherwise, is likely to mislead the consumer.”
The ARB found while Pick n Pay had claimed all deals were subject to stock availability, nowhere was this stated in the advertising.
“The ordinary reasonable customer is familiar with this phrase as it is commonly used when products are advertised. The directorate is of the view that ‘subject to availability’ is not the same as ‘limited to xxx per customer’, which is what appears to have been in play in the current situation,” the ARB found, adding it “is not convinced by the advertiser’s argument”.
The ARB said the store manager discretion in cases of high demand argument “would be acceptable if the customer was made aware of the limitation in the advertising material through a phrase such as ‘limitations per customer may apply’.”
Pick n Pay’s argument was not accepted and it was found the company had failed to indicate limitations anywhere on the milk promotion advertising.
The sanction laid down by the ARB was an instruction to Pick n Pay to ensure its pamphlets and in-store advertisements must include the limitation of the number of products a customer may purchase, or the fact that the store may exercise its discretion in this regard.

Question 1                                                                                                                                                (20marks)

Based on the case study, critically discuss five (5) forms of accusations that marketing have against harming consumers. Comment on whether Pick n Pay was wrong or correct in this instance and support your answer.

Question 2                                                                                                                                                 (10 Marks

As a new manager at Pick n Pay you have been requested to educate employees on corporate marketing ethics policies. Giving reference to the issues that took place in the case study, critical discuss the policies to your employees.

Answers to Above Questions Pick n Pay Case Study

Answer 1: Marketers make use of different types of marketing strategies in order to mislead their customers. However this can have severe consequences to marketers in the form of accusation on different grounds. The five important forms of accusation that marketing has against harming consumers could be false advertisement, inappropriate claims, incomplete information, negative advertisement, ambiguity. In the given case of Pick n Pay, it did not provide complete information in its advertisement claim which created confusion among customers.

answer

Get completed answers on above case study on Pick n Pay as provided by the assignment writing service South Africa experts of Student Life Saviour.


Content Removal Request

If you believe that the content above belongs to you, and you don’t want it to be published anymore, then request for its removal by filling the details below. It will only be removed if you can provide sufficient evidence of its ownership.

    March
    January
    February
    March
    April
    May
    June
    July
    August
    September
    October
    November
    December
    2025
    1950
    1951
    1952
    1953
    1954
    1955
    1956
    1957
    1958
    1959
    1960
    1961
    1962
    1963
    1964
    1965
    1966
    1967
    1968
    1969
    1970
    1971
    1972
    1973
    1974
    1975
    1976
    1977
    1978
    1979
    1980
    1981
    1982
    1983
    1984
    1985
    1986
    1987
    1988
    1989
    1990
    1991
    1992
    1993
    1994
    1995
    1996
    1997
    1998
    1999
    2000
    2001
    2002
    2003
    2004
    2005
    2006
    2007
    2008
    2009
    2010
    2011
    2012
    2013
    2014
    2015
    2016
    2017
    2018
    2019
    2020
    2021
    2022
    2023
    2024
    2025
    2026
    2027
    2028
    2029
    2030
    2031
    2032
    2033
    2034
    2035
    2036
    2037
    2038
    2039
    2040
    2041
    2042
    2043
    2044
    2045
    2046
    2047
    2048
    2049
    2050
    SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
    23
    24
    25
    26
    27
    28
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13
    14
    15
    16
    17
    18
    19
    20
    21
    22
    23
    24
    25
    26
    27
    28
    29
    30
    31
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    00:00
    01:00
    02:00
    03:00
    04:00
    05:00
    06:00
    07:00
    08:00
    09:00
    10:00
    11:00
    12:00
    13:00
    14:00
    15:00
    16:00
    17:00
    18:00
    19:00
    20:00
    21:00
    22:00
    23:00